Marvin Labs
Automated Equity Research Workflows: 5 High-Impact Use Cases

Automated Equity Research Workflows: 5 High-Impact Use Cases

19 min readJames Yerkess, Senior Strategic Advisor

Introduction

The value of equity research automation becomes concrete when mapped to specific analyst workflows. Abstract promises of "AI-powered research" mean little until translated into measurable time savings on the actual work analysts do every day: processing earnings, monitoring news, updating models, initiating coverage, and analyzing special situations.

This guide breaks down the five most common research workflows, showing exactly how automation transforms each in terms of time savings, quality improvements, and practical implementation. Each use case includes both traditional and AI-augmented workflows with detailed time breakdowns, enabling analysts to model ROI for their specific coverage universe.

For professionals evaluating automation tools, understanding workflow-specific value helps prioritize which capabilities matter most. A tool that saves 5 hours per week on earnings coverage delivers more value than one offering marginal improvements across ten different tasks.

For comprehensive technology background, see our guide to AI Technologies for Equity Research. For implementation strategies, see Implementing AI in Equity Research.

Overview: 5 Core Workflows

Use CaseManual TimeAI-Augmented TimeTime Savings
1. Earnings Season Coverage5.7 hours/company45 min/company87%
2. Ongoing News Monitoring3-4 hours/day40 min/day85%
3. Financial Model Updates100 min/quarter45 min/quarter55%
4. New Coverage Initiation60 hours23.5 hours61%
5. M&A and Special Situations21 hours8 hours62%

These five workflows account for approximately 75% of analyst time spent on research mechanics. Automating them creates the capacity to either expand coverage by 40-60% or reallocate 20+ hours weekly to strategic analysis, relationships, and conviction development.

Workflow 1: Earnings Season Coverage

Earnings season represents peak information overload: when an analyst's coverage universe of 50-60 companies reports within a compressed three-week window, each publishing multiple documents (press release, presentation, transcript, 10-Q) across several days. The traditional approach to manually processing every disclosure consumes 20-25 hours per week, leaving insufficient time for strategic analysis.

Traditional Manual Workflow

Per Company (5.7 hours total):

Day 1 - Press Release (4:00 PM)

  • Read 4-5 page release (15 minutes)
  • Extract key metrics: revenue, EPS, segment performance (10 minutes)
  • Compare to prior quarter and consensus estimates (15 minutes)
  • Update tracking spreadsheet (10 minutes)
  • Draft initial notes (20 minutes)
  • Subtotal: 70 minutes

Day 1 - Earnings Call (5:00 PM - 7:00 PM)

  • Listen to prepared remarks (30 minutes)
  • Listen to Q&A (40 minutes)
  • Take notes on key themes, guidance, management tone (throughout)
  • Extract guidance and compare to estimates (15 minutes)
  • Update notes with management commentary (25 minutes)
  • Subtotal: 110 minutes

Day 3 - 10-Q Filing

  • Navigate filing structure (10 minutes)
  • Review segment details and footnotes (30 minutes)
  • Extract deferred revenue, share count changes, debt details (20 minutes)
  • Cross-reference with earnings call commentary (15 minutes)
  • Update financial model (25 minutes)
  • Subtotal: 100 minutes

Synthesis and Analysis

  • Write comprehensive summary (30 minutes)
  • Compare to prior quarters (15 minutes)
  • Identify changes and trends (15 minutes)
  • Subtotal: 60 minutes

Total Traditional Time: 340 minutes (5.7 hours) per company

During peak earnings season (week 2-3), with 15-20 companies reporting, this workflow requires 85-114 hours, impossible for a single analyst working 60-hour weeks.

AI-Augmented Workflow with Marvin Labs

Per Company (45 minutes total):

Day 1 - Press Release (4:05 PM)

  • Deep Research Agent detects new release within 5 minutes
  • Agent extracts key metrics, compares to prior quarter, flags guidance changes
  • Agent generates initial summary with source citations
  • Analyst receives alert with pre-built summary (5 minutes to review)
  • Analyst Time: 5 minutes (from 70 minutes)

Day 1 - Earnings Call (5:00 PM - 7:00 PM)

  • Analyst can listen selectively, focusing on tone and Q&A nuances (optional: 30 minutes)
  • Material Summaries generated within 10 minutes of transcript publication
  • Summary highlights only new, material information vs. prior quarters
  • Management tone tracked via Sentiment Analysis
  • Analyst reviews summary and flags key themes (15 minutes)
  • AI Analyst Chat available for immediate questions
  • Analyst Time: 15 minutes (from 110 minutes)

Day 3 - 10-Q Filing

  • Agent monitors EDGAR, processes filing within 10 minutes of publication
  • Automated extraction: segment data, footnote changes, risk factor updates
  • Agent updates comprehensive summary to include 10-Q details
  • Agent flags material changes vs. prior filings
  • Analyst reviews updated summary (10 minutes)
  • Analyst uses AI Chat for specific deep-dive questions (5 minutes)
  • Analyst Time: 15 minutes (from 100 minutes)

Synthesis and Analysis

  • Agent provides comprehensive summary with all key data points
  • Analyst reviews, adds strategic interpretation (15 minutes)
  • Analyst adjusts financial model based on guidance (automated data extraction helps)
  • Analyst focuses on "so what?", implications for thesis and rating
  • Analyst Time: 10 minutes (from 60 minutes)

Total AI-Augmented Time: 45 minutes per company (87% reduction)

Peak Earnings Week Capacity:

  • Traditional: 10-12 companies maximum (60+ hours)
  • AI-Augmented: 50+ companies (40 hours, with 20 hours for strategic analysis)

Real-World Impact: Mid-Cap Tech Analyst

Before automation:

  • Peak earnings weeks: 70+ hour weeks reviewing 35-40 companies, rushing through the rest
  • Quality compromise: Insufficient time for deep analysis, missed subtle guidance changes
  • Client service: Limited availability for calls during earnings season

After implementing Marvin Labs automation:

  • Peak earnings weeks: 50 hour weeks covering all 45 companies thoroughly
  • Quality improvement: Material Summaries catch nuances she previously missed
  • Added value: 15+ hours for strategic analysis, thesis updates, client communication
  • ROI: 3x productivity increase on most time-intensive workflow

Quick Start

Quick Win: Start with Earnings Season

The highest-impact pilot timing is during earnings season, when you're already overwhelmed and time savings are most tangible.

Week 1 Pilot:

  • Sign up for automation tool with your next 5 earnings calls
  • Track time saved per company vs. your normal process
  • Calculate weekly time savings × remaining earnings season

Expected Results:

  • First earnings call: 2-3 hours saved
  • By fifth call: 4-5 hours saved (learning curve effect)
  • Remaining season: 20-40 hours saved

Decision Point: If you save 20+ hours in a single earnings season, annual ROI exceeds 10:1.

Workflow 2: Ongoing News Monitoring

Beyond earnings season, each covered company generates continuous information flow: 8-Ks (material events), investor presentations, industry reports, news articles, analyst upgrades and downgrades, regulatory filings. Manually tracking 50 companies means checking 50+ sources daily, unsustainable and inefficient.

Traditional Manual Workflow

Daily routine (3-4 hours):

  • Morning routine: Check Bloomberg, company IR pages, SEC EDGAR for new filings (45 minutes)
  • Read through 8-Ks, presentations, news articles (60-90 minutes daily)
  • Identify material information requiring action (30 minutes)
  • Update research notes and models (45 minutes)

This defensive workflow prevents surprises but consumes 15-20 hours weekly, time that could be spent on proactive analysis.

AI-Augmented Workflow

Daily routine (40 minutes):

  • Deep Research Agents monitor all 50 companies 24/7
  • Agent configuration: Alert only on material events (acquisitions, guidance changes, management changes, significant 8-Ks)
  • Automated processing: When material event detected, agent summarizes within 10 minutes
  • Analyst receives digest: Morning summary of overnight and pre-market material events (10 minutes to review)
  • Strategic triage: Analyst focuses time on truly material developments (30 minutes)

Time Reallocation:

  • Time saved: 2.5 hours daily = 12.5 hours weekly
  • Redeployed to: Deeper competitive analysis, management calls, industry research, thesis refinement

Advanced Monitoring: Multi-Company Pattern Detection

Stop the Hype

Hype: "AI monitors your companies 24/7 so you never miss anything!"

Reality: AI monitors everything but still requires analyst judgment to determine what's material. The value isn't eliminating analysis, it's filtering 50 company feeds down to the 5-10 developments that actually matter each day. Analysts still need to think, they just stop wasting time on routine monitoring.

Beyond single-company monitoring, automation enables pattern detection across coverage universe:

Industry-Wide Trends:

  • Agent monitors all companies for mentions of specific themes (supply chain, pricing, demand environment)
  • Aggregates mentions and sentiment shifts across sector
  • Flags when 5+ companies mention same issue within 2-week window

Competitive Intelligence:

  • Track when competitors mention your covered company by name
  • Monitor customer concentration risks (when major customer of Company A is Company B in your coverage)
  • Flag competitive wins and losses across ecosystem

Regulatory and Macro:

  • Track regulatory filings affecting multiple companies (new standards, compliance requirements)
  • Monitor macro themes (interest rate sensitivity, FX exposure, tariff impact)

This cross-company intelligence was previously impossible due to time constraints. Automation makes it routine.

Workflow 3: Financial Model Updates

Financial models require continuous updates: quarterly results, guidance changes, segment breakouts, share count adjustments. Manual data entry from earnings releases and filings is time-consuming and error-prone, transcription mistakes propagate through the model, creating analytical noise.

Traditional Manual Workflow

Per Company, Per Quarter (100 minutes):

  1. Extract data from press release and 10-Q (30 minutes)
  2. Manually enter into Excel model (20 minutes)
  3. Update guidance assumptions (15 minutes)
  4. Verify formulas and check for errors (20 minutes)
  5. Reconcile any discrepancies (15 minutes)

Across 50 companies: 83 hours per quarter, or 21 hours weekly averaged annually.

AI-Augmented Workflow

Specialist tools with Excel plugins automate data extraction and model updates, functioning as agents that live directly within Excel:

Daloopa

  • Excel add-in with AI copilot for financial modeling
  • Automated extraction of financial data from filings (10-Ks, 10-Qs, earnings releases)
  • Pre-built models with standardized historical data
  • One-click updates directly within Excel
  • Analyst Time: 15-20 minutes (review extracted data, adjust assumptions)
  • Reduction: 80-85%

Optimal Workflow (45 minutes total):

  • Excel-based tool handles standardized financial extraction and model building (15 minutes)
  • Analyst focuses on model architecture, scenario analysis, sensitivity testing (30 minutes)
  • Total: 45 minutes with higher quality (55% reduction + better analysis)

Accuracy Improvement:

  • Transcription errors: Reduced from 2-3% (manual) to less than 0.1% (automated)
  • Time saved on error correction: 15-20 minutes per model update
  • Confidence in model accuracy: Higher, enabling more aggressive analysis

Integration with Research Platforms

The optimal setup combines specialized data extraction tools with research platforms:

  1. Data extraction tool (Daloopa) populates Excel model with standardized financials
  2. Research platform (Marvin Labs) provides qualitative context, guidance tracking, management commentary
  3. Analyst synthesizes quantitative and qualitative inputs into investment view

This integrated approach addresses both mechanical data entry and interpretive analysis.

Workflow 4: New Coverage Initiation

Starting coverage on a new company means building comprehensive knowledge from scratch: business model, competitive positioning, financial history, management quality, key drivers, risks, and valuation framework. This "zero to expert" journey traditionally takes 40-60 hours per company, a significant investment that limits how many new names an analyst can add to coverage.

Traditional Manual Workflow (60 hours)

1. Document Collection (3 hours)

  • Download last 5 years of 10-Ks (30 minutes)
  • Download last 8 quarters of earnings transcripts (30 minutes)
  • Gather investor presentations, proxy statements, competitor filings (90 minutes)
  • Organize files and bookmarks (30 minutes)

2. Financial History Deep-Dive (12 hours)

  • Read 5 years of 10-Ks (600-1000 pages): 8 hours
  • Extract key metrics, build historical data set: 2 hours
  • Analyze segment trends, margin evolution: 2 hours

3. Management Communication Analysis (10 hours)

  • Read 8 quarters of earnings transcripts (200+ pages): 6 hours
  • Track management themes and guidance accuracy: 2 hours
  • Assess management tone and credibility: 2 hours

4. Competitive and Industry Context (8 hours)

  • Read competitor filings and research: 4 hours
  • Industry reports and market data: 2 hours
  • Channel checks and expert calls: 2 hours

5. Business Model Deep-Dive (12 hours)

  • Understand product portfolio, customer segments: 3 hours
  • Map revenue streams and unit economics: 3 hours
  • Analyze competitive advantages and moats: 2 hours
  • Identify key drivers and KPIs: 2 hours
  • Risk assessment: 2 hours

6. Financial Modeling (10 hours)

  • Build 3-statement model: 6 hours
  • Develop scenario analysis: 2 hours
  • Create valuation framework: 2 hours

7. Synthesis and Investment Thesis (5 hours)

  • Draft comprehensive initiation report: 5 hours

Total Traditional Time: 60 hours spread over 2-3 weeks

This timeline explains why analysts rarely add new names outside of forced coverage changes, the upfront investment is prohibitive.

AI-Augmented Workflow with Marvin Labs (23.5 hours)

1. Document Collection and Organization (30 minutes)

  • Automated Data Import pulls filings and investor presentations from EDGAR automatically
  • Upload third-party research reports to document library as needed
  • AI automatically organizes and indexes all documents
  • Full semantic search across entire corpus immediately available

2. Financial History Deep-Dive (3 hours)

  • AI Analyst Chat: "Summarize revenue growth, margin trends, and segment mix evolution over the last 5 years with key inflection points"
  • Response in 2 minutes with source citations to specific 10-K sections
  • Follow-up queries for deep-dives: "What explains the margin compression in 2022-2023?"
  • Analyst reviews AI summaries, validates against source documents (2 hours)
  • Extracts and organizes key metrics (1 hour with AI assistance)
  • Reduction: 12 hours → 3 hours (75% time savings)

3. Management Communication Analysis (2 hours)

  • AI Chat: "Analyze management's guidance accuracy across the last 8 quarters. When did they beat and miss and why?"
  • AI Chat: "What are the recurring themes in management commentary across recent earnings calls?"
  • Sentiment Analysis: Track management tone shifts automatically
  • Analyst reviews synthesized analysis, assesses credibility (90 minutes)
  • Focus on Q&A patterns and hedging language (30 minutes)
  • Reduction: 10 hours → 2 hours (80% time savings)

4. Competitive and Industry Context (4 hours)

  • Competitor filings automatically available; upload third-party research reports as needed
  • AI Chat: "Compare this company's revenue growth, margins, and R&D intensity to competitors X, Y, Z over the last 3 years"
  • AI Chat: "What strategic priorities does management emphasize vs. competitors?"
  • Analyst conducts expert calls and channel checks (human-only activity: 2 hours)
  • Reviews industry reports with AI summarization assistance (2 hours)
  • Reduction: 8 hours → 4 hours (50% time savings)

5. Business Model Deep-Dive (4 hours)

  • AI Chat: "Explain the company's business model, revenue streams, and customer segments with specific examples from recent filings"
  • AI Chat: "What does management identify as key competitive advantages? Has this changed over time?"
  • AI Chat: "What are the primary risks management discusses, and how has risk disclosure evolved?"
  • Analyst synthesizes AI insights, applies judgment on durability (2 hours)
  • Analyst develops proprietary perspective on key drivers (2 hours)
  • Reduction: 12 hours → 4 hours (67% time savings)

6. Financial Modeling (6 hours)

  • Use data extraction tool (Daloopa) for standardized historical financials (30 minutes)
  • Build 3-statement model (4 hours)
  • AI assistance for scenario testing and sensitivity analysis (90 minutes)
  • Reduction: 10 hours → 6 hours (40% time savings)

7. Synthesis and Investment Thesis (4 hours)

  • Deep Research Agent generates comprehensive summary
  • Agent output: Company overview, financial history, management assessment, competitive position, risks
  • Analyst crafts investment thesis and differentiated perspective (3 hours)
  • Analyst writes executive summary and recommendation (1 hour)
  • Reduction: 5 hours → 4 hours (20% time savings)

Total AI-Augmented Time: 23.5 hours completed in 1 week

Key Benefits Beyond Time Savings:

  • Comprehensiveness: AI doesn't skip sections or miss footnotes due to fatigue
  • Pattern Recognition: AI identifies themes across 5 years that humans miss in sequential reading
  • Instant Verification: Any claim can be instantly verified against source documents via chat
  • Living Knowledge Base: All documents remain searchable for ongoing coverage

Stop the Hype

Hype: "AI reads 10-Ks and writes the investment thesis for you!"

Reality: AI accelerates information absorption by 60-70%, but the investment thesis, the differentiated perspective on why this stock is mispriced, requires human judgment, experience, and conviction. AI helps you get smart faster; it doesn't replace being smart.

Workflow 5: M&A and Special Situations

Merger announcements, activist campaigns, spinoffs, and other special situations require immediate, intensive analysis under compressed timelines. When Company A announces acquisition of Company B, analysts need to understand both businesses, assess strategic rationale, evaluate valuation, and publish views within 24-48 hours, all while maintaining regular coverage responsibilities.

Traditional Manual Workflow (21 hours)

Scenario: Company A (covered) announces acquisition of Company B (not covered)

Immediate Response (6 hours)

  • Read merger announcement and investor presentation (90 minutes)
  • Quick review of Company B's most recent 10-K and earnings (3 hours)
  • Assess strategic rationale and initial valuation (90 minutes)
  • Publish hot-take note (same day)

Comprehensive Analysis (15 hours over 48 hours)

  • Deep-dive Company B historical financials (5 hours)
  • Analyze merger terms, synergies, integration risks (3 hours)
  • Build pro forma model (4 hours)
  • Assess financing and balance sheet impact (2 hours)
  • Write comprehensive M&A analysis (1 hour)

Total Time: 21 hours compressed into 48 hours, requires dropping other coverage work

AI-Augmented Workflow (8 hours)

Immediate Response (2 hours)

  • Agent processes merger announcement within 10 minutes
  • Agent generates summary: Deal terms, strategic rationale, initial metrics
  • AI Chat on Company B: "Provide overview of business model, recent financial performance, and key growth drivers"
  • Analyst reviews AI summaries (30 minutes)
  • Analyst forms initial view on strategic fit and valuation (45 minutes)
  • Analyst publishes hot-take note (45 minutes)

Comprehensive Analysis (6 hours over next 24 hours)

  • Deep Research Agent generates comprehensive Company B profile overnight
  • Agent output: 5-year financial history, management strategy, competitive position, risks
  • Analyst reviews agent summary (90 minutes)
  • AI Chat for targeted questions: "What are Company B's customer concentration risks?" "How have margins trended?"
  • Analyst builds pro forma model with automated data extraction (2 hours)
  • Analyst assesses synergies and integration challenges (human judgment: 2 hours)
  • Analyst writes comprehensive analysis (30 minutes with AI writing assistance)

Total AI-Augmented Time: 8 hours with higher quality analysis

Strategic Advantage: First-mover advantage in publishing comprehensive analysis while competitors rush basic takes

Advanced Workflow: ESG and Sustainability Analysis

NEW WORKFLOW NOT IN PILLAR ARTICLE

Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) analysis is increasingly required by institutional investors, but extracting ESG data from corporate disclosures is labor-intensive. Companies report ESG metrics inconsistently across sustainability reports, proxy statements, 10-Ks, and investor presentations.

Traditional Manual ESG Analysis (4 hours per company)

  1. Locate ESG disclosures across multiple documents (30 minutes)
  2. Extract environmental metrics (emissions, energy use, waste): 45 minutes
  3. Extract social metrics (diversity, safety, community impact): 45 minutes
  4. Extract governance metrics (board structure, compensation alignment): 30 minutes
  5. Standardize metrics for peer comparison (45 minutes)
  6. Assess materiality and disclosure quality (45 minutes)

AI-Augmented ESG Analysis (1 hour per company)

  1. AI Chat: "Extract all environmental metrics disclosed over the last 3 years with source citations"
  2. AI Chat: "Compare this company's board diversity and independence to sector peers"
  3. AI Chat: "What ESG risks does management identify, and how have disclosures evolved?"
  4. Automated extraction: Standardized ESG data table
  5. Analyst reviews automated extracts (30 minutes)
  6. Analyst assesses disclosure quality and materiality (30 minutes)

Time Savings: 75% reduction

This capability becomes critical as ESG integration moves from optional to mandatory in institutional portfolios.

Advanced Workflow: Alternative Data Integration

NEW WORKFLOW NOT IN PILLAR ARTICLE

Alternative data sources (web traffic, app downloads, credit card data, satellite imagery) provide real-time signals on business performance, but integrating alternative data with traditional financial analysis requires cross-referencing multiple sources.

Traditional Alternative Data Workflow (3 hours per insight)

  1. Receive alternative data signal (web traffic decline for Company X)
  2. Validate data quality and methodology (30 minutes)
  3. Cross-reference with company's guidance and commentary (45 minutes)
  4. Review historical correlation between alt data and reported results (45 minutes)
  5. Assess whether signal is material or noise (30 minutes)
  6. Update thesis and model if material (30 minutes)

AI-Augmented Alternative Data Workflow (45 minutes per insight)

  1. Receive alternative data signal
  2. AI Chat: "Has management discussed web traffic trends in recent earnings calls?"
  3. AI Chat: "What correlation has existed between web traffic and reported revenue historically?"
  4. Agent automatically generates comparison: Alt data signal vs. management commentary vs. historical correlation
  5. Analyst reviews synthesized analysis (15 minutes)
  6. Analyst determines materiality and updates view (30 minutes)

Time Savings: 75% reduction

Key Benefit: Faster signal validation means analysts can act on material alternative data before market prices it in.

Implementation Roadmap: Start with Highest-Impact Workflow

Quick Start

Prioritizing Workflows for Maximum ROI

Step 1: Measure Baseline Time Allocation (1 week)

Track actual time spent on each workflow:

  • Earnings season coverage: ___ hours/week
  • Daily news monitoring: ___ hours/week
  • Model updates: ___ hours/week
  • Coverage initiation: ___ hours/quarter
  • Special situations: ___ hours/month

Step 2: Calculate Potential Savings

Use the time reduction percentages from this guide:

  • Workflow X: Current time × reduction percentage = weekly savings

Step 3: Pilot Highest-Impact Workflow First

Choose the workflow with highest (weekly time × reduction percentage):

  • Typically earnings season coverage (if during Q3-Q4)
  • Otherwise, daily news monitoring (consistent year-round)

Step 4: Expand to Additional Workflows

Once first workflow delivers measurable savings:

  • Add second-highest impact workflow
  • Continue until covering top 3 workflows
  • Expect 20-30 hours/week total savings

Conclusion

The five core workflows, earnings season coverage, news monitoring, model updates, coverage initiation, and M&A analysis, account for approximately 75% of analyst time spent on research mechanics. Automation addresses each workflow differently:

  • Earnings coverage: 87% time reduction, largest absolute savings
  • News monitoring: 85% reduction, consistent year-round benefit
  • Model updates: 55% reduction + accuracy improvement
  • Coverage initiation: 61% reduction, enables portfolio expansion
  • M&A analysis: 62% reduction, competitive speed advantage

When combined, these workflows deliver 40% total workload reduction or 20-25 hours per week of analyst time reallocated from mechanical research tasks to strategic analysis, relationships, and conviction development.

The key insight: Automation value is workflow-specific. Generic AI tools that claim to "help with everything" often excel at nothing. Platforms designed for specific research workflows (like earnings processing, document extraction, or monitoring) deliver measurable ROI.

For analysts evaluating automation tools, start with the workflows that consume the most time in your specific coverage model. A sell-side analyst covering 60 names prioritizes earnings automation; a long-only analyst with 15 high-conviction positions prioritizes deep-dive initiation workflows.

To understand the AI technologies powering these workflows, see our guide to AI Technologies for Equity Research. For team implementation strategies, see Implementing AI in Equity Research. For comprehensive coverage, see our Complete Guide to Equity Research Automation.

James Yerkess
by James Yerkess

James is a Senior Strategic Advisor to Marvin Labs. He spent 10 years at HSBC, most recently as Global Head of Transaction Banking & FX. He served as an executive member responsible for the launch of two UK neo banks.

Get Started

Experience professional-grade AI for equity research, validate insights for yourself, and see how it fits into your workflow.